LivingPlaying Blog

Politicalization of the CPSIA

2010-03-18T16:38:00.007-04:00

I was recently asked for a link to an article I wrote a year ago for Change.org. The article talked briefly about the politicalization of the CPSIA (Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008). For reasons unknown, the article is no longer available on Change.org. I'm reposting it here so that it can still be accessed for those who wish to view it.

The Politicization of the CPSIA
By Jennifer Grinnell
Published February 22, 2009 @ 07:29PM PST at Change.org

After reading the opinion pieces this week in The New York Times (“Is That Fabulous New Toy Safe?” February 23rd, 2009) and the Times and Democrat (“Demint should put children first.” February 18th, 2009) regarding the CPSIA, the American consumer must be wondering, what is wrong with the children’s consumer goods industry? How could such a sensible law create such controversy?

Misleading rhetoric, unfortunately, is drowning out sensible discussion. People on one end of the American political spectrum would peg the CPSIA as part of the Democratic Party’s push for a “Nanny State,” or as motivated solely to benefit lawyers in a litigious society. On the other side are those who cheered its inception. They are appalled by calls to delay and amend the law, believing that any changes will “[endanger] the lives of millions of children.” The reality is that the CPSIA is not part of a plan to render the US a Socialist nation, nor an intended gift to trial lawyers. And the other sad reality is that the CPSIA does not protect children from law breakers any more than the standards that were in place prior to its inception did. The CPSIA is simply a piece of legislation written with the best of intentions but without the best science behind it, nor the best understanding of the multiple industry segments that make our children’s products.

Full disclosure: I am a toy retailer. But I am also a mother of three young boys. In 2007 after the first round of toy recalls were announced, I had to pry the lead-tainted Thomas the Tank Engine trains from the sticky hands of my then 2-year-old son (I really did.) He cried and I had to explain to him and his two older brothers that the toys weren’t made very carefully and that they had a “poison” in them. My then 6 year old wanted to know why the people who made the toys wanted to poison him. I had a hard time trying to explain this to myself, let alone my child. To be quite honest, I still don’t understand large-scale overseas manufacturing well enough to explain how these products got out of the plant with lead paint in them. But I can imagine it to be a combination of cost-cutting measures (is lead paint cheaper? Maybe it doesn’t take as many coats?), poor quality control and low oversight during overseas production. In other words, whoever was in charge of securing compliant components (i.e., non-toxic paint) didn’t do their job. And they broke the law. Lead paint has been illegal in the United States for decades. But I am not naïve and can also imagine it was something else, too.

So, why would manufacturers and retailers protest this law?

It’s not a bizarre opposition to the concept of chemical-free toys. Toys should be free from bio-available toxins. Period. And for that matter, so should my couch, your clothes, my mom’s food and our children’s shampoo. How do we insure that our products—all of our products—minimize harm to our bodies and the environment? We can choose to just look at toys and children’s goods but I believe we’ll miss the larger problem. The most sensible way to take lead and phthalates out of the children’s goods commerce stream is, quite literally, to go further upstream to the source of the component materials and require component testing. For example, let’s say that Fabulous Fabrics Inc makes 100,000 yards of Super Special Fabric No. 8 this year. If manufacturer A buys 100 yards of Super Special Fabric No. 8 to make a rabbit lovey, and manufacturer B buys 500 yards for his deluxe terrycloth towel in pink, why are both manufacturers required to test that same fabric? The fabric itself should be certified when the supplying manufacturer first ran its batch of 100,000 yards. Because now manufacturers A, B and probably C, D, E, F, G and H are all testing the same fabric for loveys, towels, bathmats, shower curtains, bathrobes and that strange new Snuggie blanket that seems to be vying for airtime with the Sham-Wow. That’s quite a bit of redundant testing that does not make the fabric any safer than when it left Fabulous Fabrics Inc.

It’s not because we are putting profit in front of safety. Creating safe toys actually isn’t costly. But buying that piece of paper that says products are safe is costly to a small business. And here we come to the crux of the argument: Small businesses can’t afford to prove that their already safe products are safe. On the other hand, the larger manufacturers that had the opportunity to bless the new legislation can afford to pay for 3rd party testing. They can absorb those costs into their large product runs. Individual crafters, micro and small businesses cannot. There is no other drama here. No hidden agenda. No one is trying to “wiggle out” of the law, or squeeze a larger margin out of the American people and be damned children’s health. Law abiding manufacturers are essentially being taxed to prove that they are not breaking the law. Lead paint is not legal in the US. Maybe I’m missing something essential here, but, unless it’s manufactured overseas, how would a manufacturer even obtain lead-based paint?

And it’s certainly not because we are “right-wing business groups.”[4] At Toy Fair on Sunday night, I had the opportunity to go out to dinner with some of my industry colleagues that are members of the Handmade Toy Alliance. To my left sat a vegetarian from Vermont, to my right a cloth diaper retailer from Arizona. Also at the table were people from New York, Connecticut, Minnesota and three people (me included) from Massachusetts. The sad fact about larger public discussions in the US these days is how politicized almost every subject has become. In an “us” and “them” environment, we seem to have lost site of the fact that perhaps we, the citizens who find fault with this law, actually have a legitimate point and are not trying to advance an ideology or nefarious political agenda. We are simply small business owners who have been stuck with a bill incurred by large companies that overspent on the public’s trust.

The opinion piece from the Times and Democrat allowed reader comments online. One written by Skylar 6 served as a succinct, albeit sadly cynical, summation:
“Bottom line, Left vs. Right, Dems [sic] vs. GOP, Good vs. Evil, The fight goes on.”
I sincerely hope this “fight” does not go on.

Jennifer Grinnell is Owner and Founder of the online store LivingPlaying.com, Toys & Games for Creative Play. She is also a member of the Handmade Toy Alliance and CPSIA-Central. She lives in Sherborn, MA with her husband and three children.

This article originally appeared at Change.org at http://www.change.org/ideas/4203/view_blog/the_politicization_of_the_cpsia

Happy New Year and Let's Keep Handmade Toys Safe and Legal in the US

2009-01-02T16:00:00.005-05:00

Happy New Year to everyone! I had a terrific holiday this year with lots of family and friends around. It was busy but lots of fun.

But I also spent a good chunk of my time working with a group called the Handmade Toy Alliance to keep handmade toys not only safe but legal. That's right, I said legal. You see, after the made-in-China scandal of 2007, the Consumer Product Safety Commission went into action to write a law that would require companies that sell children's goods to do many things that would obstensibly create safer toys in the US. I say obstensibly because, although their intentions were sound, the CPSC with Congress created a law that would in effect outlaw handmade toys. Simply put, the law would be so burdensome and expensive to comply with, that only large-scale manufacturers of cheap plastic toys would be able to afford to put toys out to the American public. This certainly wasn't their intention.

The Handmade Toy Alliance, along with lots of other grassroots organizations that are involved in producing goods for kids, are working to get the law changed so that they will be able to afford to comply with the rules. But to let the public know, we decided to put out a press release--written by yours truly--that describes what we've been doing to date. I hope that you will contact your local congressional leader to let them know that you want to keep handmade toys--the safest that are out there--a viable small business in our country.

So, here is the release! Feel free to pass it along to friends!

###
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

New Consumer Standards Jeopardize U.S. Handmade Toy and Children’s Goods Industry: Handmade Toy Alliance endorses modified petition that preserves small businesses

Boston, MA, January 2nd 2009—Today the Handmade Toy Alliance (HTA) announced their endorsement of the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) petition to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). The HTA is a grassroots alliance of 139 toy stores, toymakers and children's product manufacturers from across the country, who want to preserve consumer access to unique handmade toys, clothes and children's goods in the USA.

The NAM Petition, released December 18th 2008, calls for the use of component-testing certification for children’s products manufactured under the new CPSC law, as opposed to the currently mandated unit testing. HTA, in agreement with NAM, is urging the CPSC to consider the “common-sense, risk, health and safety-based exemptions,” that will “protect the public while minimizing unnecessary economic impacts on business that lack any added safety benefit to consumers.”

The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) of 2008 was passed by Congress in August of this year in response to the children's products recalls in 2007. Currently under the CPSIA, which goes into effect February 10th 2009, all goods produced for children aged 12 years and under must undergo expensive third-party tests for lead, phthalates, and other chemicals as finished products. Goods must also contain a permanent “batch” label indicating where, when and by what company the product was manufactured.

It’s the one-size-fits-all nature of the law that is causing waves in the children’s goods industry. Small or micro manufacturers point to the concept of batch labeling as an important inventory-tracking mechanism in the event of large-scale recalls of an item that was produced in the tens of thousands, but suggest this makes much less sense in the case of a company that produces only 250 felted baby slippers a year. According to HTA member Cecilia Leibovitz of CraftsburyKids.com in Vermont, a handmade children’s items store, “The owners of our companies are personally involved in every aspect of production, from procurement to storage, design, and assembly. The scale of these businesses does not permit outsourcing or loss of control over the production process.”

HTA members acknowledge the importance of the improved safety testing for children’s products, but believe that manufacturers large and small will incur exponentially greater compliance costs if they are required to test every product component individually at the finished product stage, instead of relying on testing results for each product’s component materials prior to assemblage.

Without component-based certification, many small businesses will be forced to shut their doors, according to HTA members. “In essence, only large-scale companies that produce massive lots of plastic toys or kid’s t-shirts in China will be able to comply with the law. Do we want that? I know my customers don’t.” says Jen Grinnell owner of LivingPlaying.com a specialty children’s retail store in Massachusetts.

“But component-based testing would allow many of us to continue our business, while adhering to the current regulations outlined in the CPSIA,” says Jill Chuckas, owner of Crafty Baby, a hand crafted children’s accessories company in Connecticut.

Simply, the HTA is calling for common-sense rules that fit with the realities of the children’s goods industry without compromising consumer safety. An example of this type of regulation exists already for Organic Food Certification. According to Dan Marshall of Peapods Natural Toys & Baby Care in Minnesota, “Materials-based certification is also used in other industries, including organic food certification. Component testing is already a federally recognized and reliable method, to ensure the overall end product’s safety for consumers.”

The CPSC has proposed new rules excluding “natural materials” from redundant testing processes. According to Dan Marshall, “The reasoning behind the proposed exclusion of natural materials from the new law is that the CPSC believes there is little to no risk that a piece of wood, cotton or wool by itself could become contaminated with lead during storage and manufacturing.” The same reasoning, according to HTA members, should apply to all other materials that are commonly used in children’s goods and have already been properly tested before being made into a finished product. Many of these components, such as flour, food coloring and flax seed are currently regulated by the FDA as foodstuffs. The HTA is compiling a preliminary list of these natural materials to submit to the CPSC.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Contact
Dan Marshall, Peapods Natural Toys & Baby Care
The Handmade Toy Alliance
Tel. 651-695-5559
dan@peapods.com
www.handmadetoyalliance.org

Jill Chuckas, Crafty Baby, Owner, Designer (Stamford, CT)
The Handmade Toy Alliance
Tel. 888-788-5168
jill@craftybaby.com www.handmadetoyalliance.org

Rob Wilson, Vice President, Challenge & Fun
The Handmade Toy Alliance
Tel. 888-384-6200
hta@challengeandfun.com
www.handmadetoyalliance.org

National Association of Manufacturers Petition: http://www.handmadetoyalliance.org/document-to-share/CPSCPetition1208.pdf

The Handmade Toy Alliance (HTA) is a grassroots alliance of 139 toy stores, toymakers and children's product manufacturers from across the country, who want to preserve unique handmade toys, clothes and children's goods in the USA.

###

Wheeee! It's the holiday season!

2008-12-11T11:26:00.008-05:00

My house is a shameful disaster of crushed goldfish crackers, boys crumpled socks and other childhood detritus. The laundry room is not navigable. There is a smudge of something on the stairs that I've looked at for a few days now as I've dragged my tired body up to bed. Plus, I'm wearing a baseball hat. I am not a baseball-hat-wearing gal. Truth is, I haven't been able to shower today (or yesterday). So, why is my house and my personal hygiene suffering so acutely? Because it's the holiday season and I sell toys!! Wheeeeee!!

To be honest, I am thoroughly enjoying the holiday season this year. LivingPlaying is busy, busy, busy. And the fun part for me has been the customer phone calls! As an online retailer, I don't get to interact with the customer as much as I would like. I certainly receive emails (and love to get them!) but nothing replaces talking with a customer "in person". Grandparents call and tell me about their adorable grandkids. Moms call and whisper their orders over the phone so their brood doesn't bag them and --oops!--so much for that Santa Clause person! Dads call--with a list from mom--and can I just tell you that they are really happy to hear that I offer free gift wrap and a card? The bottom line for me, though, is that selling and buying toys is a happy business to be in. It's fun to buy an incredibly cool block set, or trailer truck handmade in Maine with real, wooden logs, or dollhouse that is really beautiful!

So, thank you customers! You've made this season really fun! And because I'm feeling all Christmassy and whatnot, please use this little coupon code--HappyHolidays08--to take 5% off of your orders between now and December 14th!

Happy Holidays!

(p.s. Please remember that coupon codes can't be combined! Thanks!)

LivingPlaying.com having technical difficulties

2008-08-15T13:45:00.002-04:00

LivingPlaying.com seems to be having some major technical difficulties at present! I was alerted by a kind soul that the site "disappears" from browser-view right after logging on! We're working on it, and want to assure everyone who has placed an order that we are still here and working hard on your shipments! And for those of you who would like to place an order, you can always call the toll free number at 888-334-1313!

We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience and hope to be back up and running ASAP!

Jen Grinnell

Fabulous Contest! Win a FREE Custom Shoe Portrait

2008-07-16T14:56:00.008-04:00

Okay, file this under Cool Stuff! You know how--way back when--parents would bronze their baby's first shoes? Who does that anymore? Nobody. Well, maybe somebody, but I don't know them ;) Anyway, here is a super hip upgrade on that milestone marker: a custom painting of your child's first shoes--or first ballet shoes, mary janes, baseball cleats, Roobeez, etc. Cool, huh?! Alisha K. Ard is a fine artist who paints photo-realistic portraits of children's shoes. Sometimes they are pair that speak to a particular childhood milestone or accomplishment, or simply just tug at her client's heart. These wonderfully rendered paintings become not only unique nursery decor but a really precious heirloom.

This is not simply a review of how super cool Alisha and her magic paint brush are--no, no, no, no. This is an announcement. A CONTEST announcement, in fact. How would you like to WIN a gift certificate for a FREE custom portrait of a pair of your child's shoes? You know, the pair that floods you will memories and make you long for the diaper days again? Well, you could win this neat-o custom painting by simply clicking here and entering the contest!! Good luck!

In An Era of Distractions, Let's Encourage Pretend Play

2008-05-02T10:14:00.006-04:00

In my last blog entry Learning to Play? (er... a month ago. How did that happen?) I discussed a child development observation that has been making headlines lately: today's children don't play the way their parents did. The end result of today's play culture may be children who miss out on important developmental skills, including learning how to self-regulate in both the cognitive and social-emotional sense. In a nutshell, the observations by child specialists are that today's children:

Play almost exclusively with children their age and don't have older child "play mentors."
Are heavily involved in adult-led activities and are unable to practice unstructured make-believe play with other children.
Watch more t.v., play more video games and spend less time outside and are becoming passive both in mind and body.

So, what can we, as parents, do to change the social scaffolding that are children's lives have become attached to? The good news is that there is much we can do--whether your child is a 1 year old or 10 year old.

First of all, let's look at our own choices as parents. Putting our kids into activities like karate or gymnastics or math clubs aren't bad things to do. They are enrichment activities which are fun for kids and keep them active. What we as parents need to understand, however, is that unstructured pretend play is not "doing nothing." And it is just--if not more--important than playing both baseball and soccer. Make-believe play encourages higher symbolic thinking and the development of self-regulation (i.e. planning skills and impulse control). These cognitive and social-emotional skills are learned while children act out ideas and stories while using different props. (As an aside, this is another reason why reading to your children is so important. Having a library of stories in their heads to draw upon gives them a jumping off point for play activities and allows them to make up alternate versions of the story lines.) We need to choose to give our children the time and space to learn and exercise these skills.

So, what can we do? The following short articles written in 2008 by D.J. Leong and E. Bodrova--originators in the Tools of the Mind program--offer suggestions that parents can use to encourage mature play at home and in playgroups.

The first article, Make Believe Play at Home, breaks down the needs of children by age, noting that whereas children who are between the ages of 3-5 generally need help thinking up ideas of what to pretend, children who are between the ages of 1-3 don't know how to pretend play if no one shows them! They list simple ideas in bullet point form to help you understand what your role should be--and should not be--when encouraging make-believe play.

The second article, Mature Play Skills in Playgroups, encourages parents to invite over children of different ages, gives ideas for kick-starting the group and dealing with a very active group of children that will still encourage self-regulation.

I hope these articles are helpful! And please leave comments with any of your thoughts and suggestions on how to encourage our children to play creatively!

Learning to Play?

2008-03-28T10:24:00.014-04:00

A few weeks ago I heard an interesting segment on NPR entitled “Creative Play Makes for Kids in Control.” As an advocate of creative play, and mother to a boy with difficulties self-regulating, I was intrigued. What is the connection between open-ended play and self-regulation? It turns out, what I heard not only surprised me, but required me to rethink my assumptions about play environments and children today.

The NPR news report focuses on a particular preschool that employs the Tools of the Mind curriculum. The basic underpinnings of the Tools of the Mind program is that children today are not often in situations that require them to learn to self regulate. What is self-regulation and why is it so important? Self regulation is the ability to manage one’s feelings, behaviors and impulses. Children that are able to manage themselves better (for example, resist the urge to talk with friends during circle time or get upset because s/he wasn’t first in line) are also better able to focus, pay attention and learn.

Listening to the NPR program, I was able to hear the teachers and children in the school interact. But what I heard completely surprised me. Why? Because it didn’t sound like creative play to me—the children were required to plan out their play scenario before they even picked up a block. In fact, they needed to fill out paperwork about their intended game, draw a picture of it and verbally reiterate their intentions. Yikes, I thought. What’s up with that? Talk about an adult-driven, overly-structured environment! But I kept listening.

As it turns out, the theory behind the curricula is rooted in the belief that today children play very differently than they did when I was a child in the late 60s and 70s. Where at the age of 4 I walked out the door with my older brother and sister to join in the neighborhood kids’ game of kickball or pretend “school,” children today are highly circumscribed in their movements (allow my 4 year old to roam the neighborhood with the big kids? No way.) They spend a lot more time safely indoors with adult supervision—in a daycare or karate class with children exactly their age, or at home with the TV or some other type of electronic entertainment endlessly looping. So, whereas I learned “mature” play skills from older children in the neighborhood, children today are missing out on what we all took for granted: multi-age interaction and interaction that isn’t being regulated by an adult.

And what do many children do today in their "spare time?" Music and Movement class? Adult-led. Karate? Adult-led. Art class? Gymnastics? Baseball? All adult-led. All of these extra-curricular activities require the child to listen to an adult, and, essentially, be regulated by an adult. And although the classes are stimulating and beneficial in specific ways, children are not practicing how to self-regulate as they would during make-believe play with other children. Older children—referred to as “play mentors” by child specialists—model more mature and creative play that engages symbolic thinking, exercises the executive brain functions (i.e., planning, rule acquisition, ability to control impulses) and leads to mature self-regulating behaviors. With all of the enrichment classes and scheduled same-age play dates, the opportunities for children to learn mature play skills from older children are few and far between. The basic emotional and cognitive skills that we took for granted while playing with the neighborhood kids aren't being learned by a whole generation of children.

So then what does this curriculum featured on NPR have to do with creating opportunities for children to learn from “play mentors”? Aren’t these classroom situations still adult-led? Not exactly. Let’s back up. Have you ever watched your child talk to themselves during play? I never really thought much about it when my 4 year old would talk out loud to no one in particular about what his car was doing or what it was going to do (Cooper is freakishly obsessed with cars). Apparently during make-believe play children carry on this inner dialog about what they are doing which, essentially, is a form of self-regulation. They think it (plan the intended play); they say it (“super-fast race car is going to rescue race car no. 55 from the sharks!”); and then they do it. Kids also carry on that dialog during make believe play with each other—plus additional steps such as negotiation. So, back we are to the Tools of the Mind program. That paperwork and planning? It’s mimicking the inner dialog children would be doing under circumstances where make believe play happens often and with multi-age children. In a nutshell, the program is giving children opportunities to exercise mature make-believe play skills, learn to develop those skills and, in turn, learn self-regulation. By mimicking the process of inner dialog, and modeling "play mentor" behavior, the Tools of the Mind program taps that part of the brain that requires executive functioning—an increasingly underused cognitive skill for children who spend a great deal of time being entertained.

It does make you wonder about the rise in children with ADHD. Certainly there are children whose behavior is not a result of missed make-believe play opportunities. But, what about the other children who show ADHD characteristics—impulsive, emotional and unfocused—yet are not unduly hindered by the learning challenges faced by those clearly diagnosed with the disorder? Why the rise in children with this type of emotional and cognitive challenges? Many specialists seem to think it’s a direct result of lost emotional and cognitive learning opportunities usually met through pretend play.

Over the years I've noticed that my older son--who has sensory integration difficulties and trouble self regulating-- plays more calmly and with more purpose when he is with an older playmate. It is interesting to note that processing sensory information is done in the executive regions of the brain. Would my son benefit from a more make-believe play time? Possibly, but I think that he might benefit from make-believe play time with more mature play mentors. Since he is my oldest child, he doesn't have the opportunities that my younger children have to learn from a bigger kid. Except that when it comes down to it, I'm a big kid. I'm not as good as an 8 year old boy, but I can certainly fill in some gaps.

Stay tuned for suggestions on how you can find opportunities for your child to engage in make-believe play both with other kids and at home.

How does a mermaid tail promote social and language skills?

2008-03-24T08:41:00.005-04:00

This is the question a friend asked me recently after she spent some time on LivingPlaying.com. She was viewing our Dress Up & Playhouses category and noticed the Mermaid Tail And Crown dress up set. She also noticed the icon for social and language skills. "How," she asked, "does a mermaid tail aid in such important skill development?" It's a valid question, and the answer is not terribly obvious, I suppose.

Pretend or dramatic play is a complex process which takes root at about 1 to 2 years old, but becomes more obvious and interactive past the age of 3. Where a 2 year old might imitate his parents actions (i.e. cooking or cleaning) a 4 year old will include props and other children in his more complicated scenario (a dinner party). Children practice and learn developmental skills through play. They learn how to interact with other children and adults while engaging in pretend play.

But how would a costume aid in social and language skills? When children try on or create costumes, they are trying on the rules and personas of the world around them. They get to decide how to use a costume to express themselves. They can create roles and rules for others. But in order to do these things, children need to learn how to successfully respond to or communicate feelings or wishes. In other words, kids need to use their words or body to make themselves understood.

In addition, as children explore a fantasy, they also have the opportunity to seek out the language to express that fantasy. This is where parental verbal support aids in development. Your child says "Mommy, I'm a mermee! I can swim!" and you say "Oh! Are you a mermaid? Do you live in the ocean? Do you have scales on your tail?" And the child's fantasy is enriched by your encouragement and suggestions. You hear her use the word scales and listen as she tells you that hers are magical and help her swim faster in the ocean. Her playdate is now her mermaid sister and they are searching for a place to live.

Makes you want to be a kid again, doesn't it? :)

On Parenting and the Detritus of Life

2008-02-07T11:01:00.000-05:00

Parenting is hard. That's not news, right?

I find myself struggling to keep up with all of the moving parts of my children's lives. I'll bet lots of other parents do as well. But it never looks that way from the outside, does it? From where I stand, it seems that all of the other parents at my children's school are up-to-date with handing in forms and permission slips, effortlessly remember to bring in old milk jugs, egg cartons or other random recyclable craft project supplies, have the show-and-tell dates engraved on the inside of their arms and find the time to volunteer no matter what their busy schedule.

This is not me.

I would like to be that parent. I aspire to be that parent. But I am not that parent. I am that parent. You know, the other one.

Case in point: I completely forgot to hand in a recipe for my 4 year old's class cookbook. Just totally forgot. So, yesterday I receive the recipe book and I'm flipping through it feeling guilty. And then...the knife in the heart. I read:

Quote:

From the Kitchen of Cooper G.
Recipe: Chicken Nuggets and French Fries

People at the french fry store make the french fries and chicken nuggets. Eat them when you get home. Dip the chicken nuggets and french fries into ketchup. Eat it and drink chocolate milk.

Oh...the humiliation...

What's new? Lots!

2008-01-28T21:01:00.000-05:00

Now that the holiday season is over I've been able to catch my breath and focus on restocking the store (Sarah's Silks, Anatex mazes and ImagiPLAY puzzles are back!). Plus, I'm finding new, fun products that I know you'll love! I've put together a preview of new in-stock items and new, fun things to come! So check 'em out and let me know what you think!

(And Pssst! Don't miss our special Winter Clearance Sale where you will find an assortment of creative play toys from 20-50% off!! Don't forget, with a $100 order we also ship UPS ground for FREE!)

What's New In Stock

In our crafts section: In stock!
Super fun project kits for kids 8+ which include adorable themed Rock Painting Kits. Cat & Mouse, Pirate & Treasure, Dragon & Castle. How fun is that??
Reg. Price: $9.99

In Montessori: In stock!
This Layered Oak Leaf Puzzle depicts the beautiful transformations that occur during an Oak Leaf's life cycle, while using layers to enhance sorting, spatial placement and manual dexterity skills. Great hands-on learning tool!
Reg. Price: $16.99

In Classic Wooden Toys: In Stock!
The timeless Village of Towers Block Set is a carefully proportioned, open-ended block set comprised of 27 pieces that all nest into the largest 9 x 9 inch cube for easy storage. The set encourages freethinking and creativity, and helps develop an awareness of spatial placement.
Reg. Price: $59.99

In Dress Up: In Stock!

Pretend Dress-Up and Play-Along Kits are designed to give boys and girls a satisfying interactive play experience, complete with a book and a costume in every box. Look for The Fairy Princess Pretend Dress Up Kit and the I'm a Pirate Captain Pretend Dress Up Kit!
Both Reg. Price: $12.99

In our new category One-of-A-Kind Sock Animals: In stock!
Will you look at that face?! This is Pokey. And he is something special. You must come meet his friends.
Reg. Price: $34.99

Coming Soon!
Coming soon are some really special items for our Dress Up and Pretend Play categories. Each are handmade here in the USA by a talented young mother and designer. Here is a preview!

In Pretend Play: Coming Soon!
Valentine Postcard Set. This adorable hand-sewn postcard pair is the perfect Valentine's Day Play set for your little love! Send hugs and kisses over and over and over again!
Reg. Price: $14.99

In Dress Up: Coming Soon!
The Mermaid Tail. What I love about this costume is how easy it is for kiddos to play. The tail ties around the waist with a grosgrain ribbon to accommodate many different sized mermaids and let them swim (run) free! Plus, it's washable!
Reg Price: $44.99

So stop by the store to check out our new cool stuff! And after next month, I will be adding even more new products after my annual visit to the New York Toy Fair in February (this is where toy manufacturers showcase their new product lines to buyers. Very fun!).

As always, feel free to drop a line if you don't see something that you would like to have, or, if you have questions about availability--or even if you just want to say "hi!" I would love to hear from you!

Take good care,

Jen
Owner
LivingPlaying.com
Toys & Games for Creative Play

Shipping Issues for LivingPlaying Solved

2007-12-14T09:20:00.000-05:00

Some of you may have noticed some bizarre shipping charges at checkout yesterday, as well as problems putting some items in your shopping cart. My sincere apologies for the glitch. I can't imagine what some of you must have thought when you received an almost $40 shipping charge! I'm actually quite embarassed. {blush} I send out thanks to one customer who called to tell me about the problem(s). Thank you Katherine!

On another, but related note: as many of you are aware, LivingPlaying does not combine coupon codes and the $100 free shipping offer. I ask that you please honor that condition when you are checking out. If you inadvertently use the coupon code when you have placed more than $100 of product in your cart, I will manually re-figure the shipping and discount when your order is processed so that you receive the higher of the two discounts, but not both. Thank you!

And finally, there are some items that require a shipping surcharge because they are heavy or bulky or both (we have a 27 lb item--can you believe that? it's darn heavy). That surcharge is in addition to regular shipping charges. However, if you purchase more than $100 worth of product, you will only be charged the surcharge for the heavy item, not shipping for the rest of the products. Make sense? Excellent. If you have further questions, please check out our Shipping Policies page for more answers: http://www.livingplaying.com/free-shipping.html

That's it! And of course if you have questions about the policy or run into problems on the site, please do call me. I'm more than happy to chat and resolve any problem!

Parenting Paranoia Club. Membership is Mandatory!

2007-12-13T13:35:00.000-05:00

When my son Ryan was about 11 months old, I realized that all mothers have at least one closely-held and largely unshakable Parenting Paranoia. (And I say “at least” because my anecdotal evidence reveals that typically we have more than one.) I came to this realization several years ago as I was driving with a childhood friend and our two children to the Boston Children’s Museum. My friend Ruthie seemed somewhat distracted by the kids in the back. Both kids were securely strapped into their car seats, but she kept turning around to “check,” give her son’s car seat a little shake, and adjust the already secure straps. Earlier that day, she had installed her son’s car seat into my car. She hadn’t been totally happy with the installation, even though to my eye and standards, it was fine. I didn’t think much more about it.

Later, after we were done with the chaos of the museum, and were sitting down to grab a snack, she watched me carefully break apart somewhat soggy french fries and place them in front of Ryan to eat. She looked at me quizzically and said “are you afraid of him choking?” Yes, I admitted somewhat sheepishly. I’d had this fear ever since he started eating solid foods at around 6 months. “The mandible is pretty hard,” she said. “They do a good job of mashing up food if kids don’t have all their teeth in yet.” I knew she was right, but my fear, though not unreasonable, was somewhat paranoid—not unlike her car seat “issue.” She later admitted to me that she fears car seat failure more than most people might feel is healthy.

But paranoia aside, I later was glad to have a fixation on choking—or rather on preventing choking. Several months after the Children’s Museum outing, when Ryan was now 18 months old, I had neglected to cut up all of his grapes, and sure enough, my boy got one stuck in his windpipe. Luckily I knew how to dislodge the grape, and it popped right out. The reason I knew how to help him was because I’d paid especially close attention to the instructions during a mini CPR course I’d taken a few months earlier. Paranoia saves the day!

In all seriousness, though, food isn’t the only choking danger for children.

Toys are labeled “not for children under three” for a reason
We often see age recommendations on the boxes or directions for children's toys. Why are they there? Retailers and manufacturers have good reason to make these recommendations. One obvious reason is to let you know if a toy is developmentally appropriate for your child. He or she will get the most enjoyment out of a product that is specifically made for his or her developmental range. The other reason toys have recommended ages is simply to keep your child safe. Many wonderful toys on the market are perfectly safe for your 10 year old, but not for a child under three. That is because children under the age of three typically explore objects not only with their eyes and hands, but also with their mouths. This type of behavior is developmentally appropriate and not easily discouraged as most parents already understand. In order to keep children safe, toys that contain small parts are labeled "Age: 3+" because they may contain small parts that could get stuck in the narrow throat of a young child and pose a choking hazard. As a general rule, if a toy or toy part can fit in or pass through a toilet paper tube, it is a choking hazard and should be put away until your child has left his or her oral phase behind. If you have older children in the house, toys with small parts should be played with out of the reach of younger siblings or playmates. It is a good idea for parents to look beyond the labeled information, however, and examine new toys for their potential as a choking hazard. And that means not just small parts, but small parts that might break up during the course of play.

Toy Recalls, Holiday Buying and Taking Stock

2007-10-04T08:18:00.000-04:00

You’re a parent. It’s almost holiday buying time. Toy recalls seem to crop up in the paper daily. What can you do to ensure that the toys you buy and give are what they say they are—safe, non-toxic and environmentally friendly?

As a toy retailer and a mother, I’ve been thinking about this question a lot. And I’ve been looking around my playroom (and stockroom) and eyeing suspiciously toys that I took a lot of care and—let’s face it, joy—when buying. I love wooden and creative play toys. They are beautiful and well made. Many of them are artful. Some are even designed by architects. My children play for longer and with more imagination with an open-ended toy than a directed-play toy. It used to be that I would only worry about the safety of those hardwood Unit Blocks when they were used as a weapon by my oldest son (okay I still worry about that) but now I have other concerns. And so do you.

When the Thomas the Tank Engine recall was announced in June, I responded by prying those trains out of my 2 year old son’s sticky little hands and then chastising myself for buying the character-driven set in the first place. When the subsequent recalls happened--lead-paint in bibs, boots and other toys and goods that were outsourced for manufacture in China—the vast scope of the problem began to dawn on me. After the first waves of panic subsided, I drew up a plan to tackle what felt like an overwhelming problem. I’m sharing it here with you so that you can feel more confident and in control about what you already own, and what you may buy in the future. Nothing is ever 100%, but taking steps to minimize the potential hazards that our children are exposed to is not only common sense, but puts some control back in the consumer’s hands.

Here is my list of action items a parent can do now:

Take Stock of Your Playroom—But Not Just the Toys
It might take you a while, but go through the toys, games, art supplies and furniture that your children use. Now is a good time to recycle or throw away those that aren’t played with anymore, or are damaged.

Write Down the Names of the Toy Manufacturers
Make a list of the manufacturers that supplied the toys and goods that your children use. Most toys have a brand somewhere on the product. If you can’t find the name of the manufacturer, write a short product description, i.e. toy dog, heart-shaped nose, black button eyes.

Go to the US Consumer Product Safety Commission website
Check to see what recalls are listed on CPSC.gov. On the press release section, scroll down and search by product type, company or product description. Are any of your toys or other products on the list? If so, take appropriate action. The CPSC website should have specific information on what to do. Next, look at the recent toy recall announcements. Cross match that against the list of manufacturers that are in your playroom. Even if the specific toys aren’t in your playroom, make note of the one’s with violations. Finally, sign up for the recall email announcements from CPSC at http://www.cpsc.gov/cpsclist.aspx. You will have the latest toy recall information sent directly to your mailbox.

Call the manufacturers and ask the right questions
Of the manufacturers on your list, call first those that are represented in your playroom and that have recalled products. The list of questions below will help you assess the standards by which they make their toys. Note that the European (EN 71) testing standard is more rigorous than the American testing standard.

Where are your products manufactured? If in China, do you own your own manufacturing plant? Or do you utilize independent Chinese manufacturers?
Do you perform lab testing on all of the colors, chemicals and plastics that you purchase from your suppliers? To what level (i.e. 100%)? How often? Who does the testing?
Do you select random samples of finished products from your inventory for a third party lab to test? How often?
Do you have third-party test reports for all products by type and model? Which standards do you use? EN 71 (European) or the American Standard?
Will you supply those test results to consumers if requested?

Buy a lead testing kit and use it
Consumer environmental home-testing kits have been around for years. They are a relatively inexpensive way to do a fast qualitative check for hazardous elements in the home. I purchased several surface lead-testing kits for $9.95 each through Pro-Lab (http://www.prolabinc.com/). These kits are made specifically to test home items such as toys, ceramics, and dinnerware. But a quick Google search for lead surface test kits will give you many options to choose from. The kits I purchased contained 6 non-toxic tests each and gave results in two minutes. The test is qualitative, meaning it gives a yes/no answer, and does not tell you a specific amount of lead present. But it does detect the presence of lead “to as little as 5 parts per million.”

Develop buying criteria for the future that you can live with
Considering that over 80% of the toys sold in the United States are actually made in China, it is almost inevitable that you will either purchase, or receive, a toy made in a Chinese manufacturing plant. Think through your own risk-tolerance level. Are you willing to own toys that are made in China? What about those made in China, but in American-owned manufacturing plants? After doing your own research, are there certain brands that you trust more than others? Is testing your own toys important to you? Do you feel most comfortable purchasing only American-made or European-made toys? (Remember that some toys imported from Europe are also manufactured in China.) What guidelines do you want to give grandparents and other gift-givers this holiday season when it comes to buying products for your children? Having a clear idea of what is and what is not acceptable to you will put some of the control and safety back in your hands.

The good news for American consumers is that the Toy Industry Association (TIA) is proactively working with the Federal Government and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to create new, more rigorous standards for third-party testing. They are also encouraging the Federal Government to adopt a requirement that all toys sold in the US meet those new safety standards. In other words, the TIA is asking the Federal Government to create standards for toy safety that will now be the law, not voluntary. Perhaps the American toy manufacturers will start to rethink their standards, and remember that although profits are, of course, part of being a business, being greedy at the expense of our children’s safety is a shameful practice.

Jennifer Grinnell
Owner
http://www.livingplaying.com/
Toys and Games for Creative Play